Simpson's Paradox and Investing (2024)

Investing oftentimes involves closely examining numbers. Investors rely on data, and trends in that data, to provide insights into what's happening with their investments. Numbers can sometimes look odd to analysts too; which is certainly true with Simpson's Paradox.

In this article, we're going to discuss the topic of Simpson's Paradox. As part of that explanation, we'll provide a brief history of the term as well as a summary definition. Then we'll finish this topic with some examples, illustrating how this paradox can apply to investment portfolios.

Simpson's Paradox

Additional Resources
Analyzing Income Statements Building an Income Statement Rule of 72 and Compounding Absolute Versus Relative Return Financial versus Managerial Accounting Understanding the Cash Conversion Cycle

In the study of probability and statistics, Simpson's paradox is defined as the seemingly contradictory result that occurs when improvements in all subpopulations occur, yet when these subpopulations are combined, the improvement is lost.

History

In the paper "The Interpretation of Interaction in Contingency Tables," published in the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society back in 1951, Edward Hugh Simpson explained the phenomenon whereby an event that would increase the occurrence of a condition in a given population could, at the same time, decrease the occurrence of that same condition in every subpopulation.

The importance of this paper to all analysts is simple: Don't make assumptions about data; take care when interpreting numbers. Let's see how this works with some practical examples.

Finding Average Values

Every analyst knows that when examining a population, it's possible to calculate average values for each segment of the population. They also know it's incorrect to take an average of those average values to determine the average for the population. This point can be demonstrated with a hypothetical example consisting of a three-stock portfolio:

Average Value Example

InvestmentStarting ValueEnding ValueIncrease
Stock A10011010.0%
Stock B20024020.0%
Stock C30039030.0%
Totals60074023.3%

By taking a simple average of the increase for the above three stocks, the analyst might incorrectly conclude the overall portfolio increase was 20%. The total row demonstrates the correct value is actually 23.3%. Anyone that's made this mistake in the past knows the rule is "you cannot take an average of an average."

Another foolproof solution is to find the weighted average of each segment and add them together as shown in this second example:

Weighted Value Example

InvestmentStarting ValueEnding ValueIncreaseWeighted Value
Stock A10011010.0%1.7%
Stock B20024020.0%6.7%
Stock C30039030.0%15.0%
Totals60074023.3%23.3%

The weighted value is found by taking each starting value and dividing it by the total of all starting values, then multiplying that number times the increase. For Stock A, the calculation is:

Stock A Weighted Value = (100 / 600) x 10.0% = 1.7%

Is it possible for every stock in a portfolio to increase its year-over-year return and the overall value of the portfolio to decrease? The answer is yes, especially if someone is actively trading stocks.

Investment Portfolios

A very simple stock portfolio example is able to demonstrate Simpson's paradox. In this case, there is a hypothetical portfolio consisting of three stocks, and trading is limited to exchanges between these stocks. The total number of shares held at the start and end of this timeline will be exactly the same (3,000). Finally, the ending value of each stock will be exactly 10% higher than its starting value. Unfortunately, the ending value of the portfolio is exactly 10% lower than the starting value, as demonstrated in the example below.

Simpson's Paradox: Stock Example

Stock AStock BStock CTotals
Starting Stock Value$10.00$20.00$30.00
Shares Held1,0001,0001,0003,000
Starting Value$10,000$20,000$30,000$60,000
Stock Ending Value$12.00$24.00$36.00
Shares Held2,0005005003,000
Ending Value$24,000$12,000$18,000$54,000

For the above to be true, there were obvious dips in the value of stocks when the majority of the trades occurred. Still, this example makes the point, and this scenario can, and does, occur all the time. During bear markets, many investors try to time the market and wind up selling low, only to re-enter the market after prices have risen. This is the classic mistake of "buy high / sell low."

A more commonly cited example of Simpson's paradox has to do with unemployment rates. This example involves breaking a population into subgroups based on their level of education. Over a five-year timeframe, each segment experiences an increase in unemployment, yet the unemployment rate of the entire population goes down. This second example illustrates how this can happen.

Simpson's Paradox: Unemployment Example

No High SchoolHigh SchoolCollege DegreeTotals
Initial Counts10,000,00010,000,00010,000,00030,000,000
Unemployment Rate8.0%6.0%4.0%6.0%
Unemployment Count800,000600,000400,0001,800,000
Final Counts5,000,0005,000,00020,000,00030,000,000
Unemployment Rate8.8%6.6%4.4%5.5%
Unemployment Count440,000330,000880,0001,650,000

In this second example, the unemployment rate for each subgroup increased by 10%, yet the overall rate fell from 6.0% to 5.5%. These two examples not only serve to illustrate Simpson's paradox, but also the importance of examining data with care.

About the Author - Simpson's Paradox and Investing

Explore Investing Further

Best US Trading Platforms and Stockbrokers for 2024

Trading has never been easier, thanks to the rise of online platforms that enable you to buy and sell various assets at the click of a button. But with so many options available, it can be challenging to decide which platform is right for you.

Best Forex Trading Platforms for Beginners, Ranked for 2024

Best Swap-Free Forex Accounts for US Traders in 2024

Looking for a way to avoid swap fees while trading forex?

Best ETF Platforms, Ranked for March 2024

Below listed are the small reviews of the top 10 ETF brokers available across the United States.

Our top beginner's pick for copy trading is eToro. Read on for more details, plus seven good alternatives.

Best Stocks for Swing Trading and Where to Buy Them

Swing trading stocks can be a great way for investors to take advantage of short-term stock market movements and gain significant returns. If you're interested in swing trading, the key to success lies in selecting the right stocks to buy and sell quickly for a profit.

Best Penny Stocks Under $2 to Buy in 2024

The table below lists the best stock picks under $2, listed on public exchanges.

Promising Penny Stocks Under $1 to Buy in 2024

The table below lists the best stock picks under $1, listed both on public and OTC exchanges.

The Best Technology Penny Stocks for 2024

This section will highlight the best EV-trading penny stocks available in the United States.

The Best EV Battery Penny Stocks to Buy in 2024

The demand for sustainable energy has grown rapidly in recent years. This has resulted in increased scrutiny of the automotive market. As a result, the electric vehicle (EV) industry has made significant advancements.

The Most Active Penny Stocks in 2024

Intelligent Bio Solutions Inc. is a life sciences company, founded in 2016 with headquarters in New York and is engaged in performing diagnostic tests, real-time monitoring, and non-invasive surgery for its patients. The firm has developed a CoV-2 Biosensor, which can be used in RNA virus detection.

New Penny Stocks to Buy in 2024

Hour Loop was founded in 2013 with headquarters in Redmond, Washington. It’s an online retailer involved in e-commerce in the United States that hit the public markets on Jan 7th of 2022. The company sells home/garden decor, electronic products, kitchenware, and apparel through walmart.com, amazon.com, and hourloop.com.

Simpson's Paradox and Investing (2024)

FAQs

Simpson's Paradox and Investing? ›

In a nutshell, Simpson's paradox tells a lot about a complex non- linear world affecting multi-trillion dollars factor investing globally, and also the social and other areas have wide implications where such paradoxical scenarios could be fundamental characteristics of the world we live in, that also reflect the role ...

What is a good real life example of Simpson's paradox? ›

Another example of Simpson's Paradox can be found in the batting averages of two famous baseball players, Derek Jeter and David Justice, from 1995 and 1996 [source]. David Justice had a higher batting average in both 1995 and 1996 individually, but Derek Jeter had a higher batting average over the two years combined.

What does Simpson's paradox teach us? ›

Visualization of Simpson's paradox on data resembling real-world variability indicates that risk of misjudgment of true causal relationship can be hard to spot. Simpson's paradox has been used to illustrate the kind of misleading results that the misuse of statistics can generate.

What is the Simpsons paradox in business? ›

Simpson's paradox, named after a British statistician who first described it in 1951, is a statistical fallacy that occurs when aggregated groups of data show a particular trend, but that trend is reversed or eliminated when the data is de-aggregated (or, simply put, broken down).

Why is Simpson's paradox a problem? ›

Simpson's Paradox is a powerful reminder of the complexities inherent in data analysis. As we've seen through examples from university admissions and public health, failing to account for subgroup variations can lead to conclusions that are not only incorrect but potentially misleading.

How do you avoid falling for the paradox Simpson's paradox? ›

Avoiding Simpson's Paradox

This assumes, of course, that the randomization is effective and that assignment to treatment condition is independent of possible covariates. If so, regardless of whether these covariates are related to the outcome, Simpson's paradox cannot occur.

How do you overcome Simpson's paradox? ›

Simpson's paradox can be avoided by selecting an appropriate experimental design and analysis that incorporates the confounding variable in such a way as to obtain unconfounded estimates of treatment effects, thus more accurately answering the research question.

When should you suspect Simpson's paradox? ›

Simpson's paradox explained, or when facts aren't really facts. the effect that occurs when the marginal association between two categorical variables is qualitatively different from the partial association between the same two variables after controlling for one or more other variables…

How to handle Simpson's paradox? ›

Simpson's Paradox will generally not be a problem in a well‐designed experiment or survey. You can identify possible lurking variables ahead of time and properly control them by eliminating them, holding them constant for all groups, or including them in the study.

How likely is Simpson's paradox? ›

The inequality is then used to estimate the probability that Simpson's paradox would occur at random in path models with two predictors and one criterion variable. This probability is found to be approximately 12.8 percent; slightly higher than 1 occurrence per 8 path models.

What is the famous economic paradox? ›

In economics, the Jevons paradox (/ˈdʒɛvənz/; sometimes Jevons effect) occurs when technological progress increases the efficiency with which a resource is used (reducing the amount necessary for any one use), but the falling cost of use induces increases in demand enough that resource use is increased, rather than ...

What is Simpson's paradox and how does it impact data analysis? ›

Simpson's Paradox is when a trend or output is present when the data is put into groups that either reverse or disappear when the data is combined. It is a statistical paradox where it can draw two opposite conclusions from the same data, depending on how the data is grouped.

Which of the following best describes Simpson's paradox? ›

Final answer: Simpson's Paradox is a statistical phenomenon where a trend displayed by the overall data reverses or disappears when the data is divided into subgroups.

What is the paradox of value in economics? ›

The paradox of value (also known as the diamond–water paradox) is the contradiction that, although water is on the whole more useful, in terms of survival, than diamonds, diamonds command a higher price in the market.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Rev. Leonie Wyman

Last Updated:

Views: 5603

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (59 voted)

Reviews: 90% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Rev. Leonie Wyman

Birthday: 1993-07-01

Address: Suite 763 6272 Lang Bypass, New Xochitlport, VT 72704-3308

Phone: +22014484519944

Job: Banking Officer

Hobby: Sailing, Gaming, Basketball, Calligraphy, Mycology, Astronomy, Juggling

Introduction: My name is Rev. Leonie Wyman, I am a colorful, tasty, splendid, fair, witty, gorgeous, splendid person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.